Search for: "Taylor v. Charter"
Results 21 - 40
of 159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 5:00 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals recent decision in Peltier v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
The Feres doctrine, stemming from the 1950 Feres v. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 6:48 pm
Reg. 82/20 of the Act in Hudson’s Bay Company ULC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 5:00 am
Here are our leading legal headlines for the week of February 8, 2021 from Wise Law on Twitter: Court sides with mentally disabled man after immigration hearing questions legitimacy of his marriageInternet harassment: Caplan v Atlas Prof. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 8:49 pm
In United Steelworkers Local 2251 v Algoma Steel Inc., in an arbitration of a dual Canadian-American citizen working in Canada, but living on the American border. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Bork v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 2:21 pm
Dodge (ICRA Habeas Corpus; Tribal Court Exhaustion Doctrine)Oxendine-Taylor v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:14 am
In 77 Charters, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 9:22 am
LAW LIBRARY level 3: K3631 .T39 2019Glenn Taylor, The Horse Who Came to Dinner: The First Criminal Case of Food Fraud ([Cambridge]: Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019). [read post]
