Search for: "Taylor v. Duke"
Results 21 - 40
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2021, 5:23 am
The case is entitled Travis Taylor, Terry Barrows, and Layton Ferrell Duke v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 5:30 pm
Taylor of Morrison Foerster on the firm’s blog, SociallyAware Two Washer Cases Provide the Supreme Court with Its Best Opportunity Since Wal-Mart v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
| Who can use "Duke" as TM in the US? [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
In a 1984 case, North Carolina v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 9:49 pm
Starble, Gimme an ‘S': The High Court's Grammatical Divide, Legal Times, Oct. 9, 2006 Stuart Taylor, Jr., Something's Rotten at Duke, Nat'l. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:23 am
Taylor, 124 S.W.3d 87, 92 (Tenn. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:20 pm
Roper, and Taylor v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
IPSO 18075-23 Singh v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18301-23 Taylor v The Herald on Sunday, 1 Accuracy 2021, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 19677-23 A complainant v The Daily Telegraph, 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19741-23 Dikme v eveningnews24.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction:… [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:43 am
In re Duke, 305 N.J. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
Absent negligence, the duty to repair only arose once the landlord was aware that damage had been caused.On the specific leaks, he found CHA were liable in respect of the February 2005 leak, as this could and should have been remedied by 8 April 2005, not 26 April, following Duke of Westminster v Guild [1985] 1 QB 688 and Gordon and Teixeira v Selico Co Ltd (1986) 18 HLR 219On the other leaks, he found that CHA had carried out repairs in good time and that the flood from… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
Absent negligence, the duty to repair only arose once the landlord was aware that damage had been caused.On the specific leaks, he found CHA were liable in respect of the February 2005 leak, as this could and should have been remedied by 8 April 2005, not 26 April, following Duke of Westminster v Guild [1985] 1 QB 688 and Gordon and Teixeira v Selico Co Ltd (1986) 18 HLR 219On the other leaks, he found that CHA had carried out repairs in good time and that the flood from… [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:10 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Resource Investments v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Duke University)Becker Robert A. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 7:30 am
App. 551, 553 (2006) (Duke University Health Systems records); State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am
On the same day there was a directions hearing in the case of Kent Police v Taylor before Nicklin J. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
The publisher of the Daily Mirror has lost the latest round of a High Court fight with claimants including the Duke of Sussex, who say they were victims of phone hacking. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:58 am
Rubinfeld (NYU), on Friday, July 3, 2020 Tags: Asset management, Common ownership, Firm performance, Index funds, Institutional Investors, Ownership An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Decision in Liu v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:55 am
Supreme Court decision Taylor v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
On the same day there was a hearing in the case of Taylor v Crouch and another before Nicklin J. [read post]
