Search for: "Taylor v. Gordon" Results 21 - 40 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2016, 5:16 am by INFORRM
This was the meeting in June 2008 where James Murdoch met with News International’s legal manager Tom Crone to discuss legal action taken by hacking victim Gordon Taylor, chief executive of the Professional Footballers Association. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 12:37 am by Florica Rus
Later, on 16 October 2019, the Advocate General (AG) at the CJEU delivered his much-awaited opinion in the matter Sky v. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 5:16 am by Anushka Limaye
And Brian Corcoran examined how Mondelez v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The judgment handed down by Mr Justice Mann on 21 May 2015 in the Mirror Group quantum cases, Gulati and others v MGN ([2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch)), represents a turning point in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:40 am by Kevin
Gordon, slip op. at 1 (6th Cir. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 5:03 pm by Randall Reese
 A copy of the rejection motion can be found here.Anchor Blue is being represented in the bankruptcy cases by the law firms of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP and Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP. [read post]
1 May 2019, 8:10 am by Ilya Somin
Danforth, Cody Delistraty, Nikolas Gvosdev, Cherie Harder, Jason Kuznicki, Markos Moulitsas, Alan Taylor, James V. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm by INFORRM
         MARIA JAYNE WYATT v GORDON A CARTWRIGHT  10/11/2010 8. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm by NFS Esq.
Medeiros, State Solicitor General, Gordon Burns, Deputy State Solicitor General, James M. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Absent negligence, the duty to repair only arose once the landlord was aware that damage had been caused.On the specific leaks, he found CHA were liable in respect of the February 2005 leak, as this could and should have been remedied by 8 April 2005, not 26 April, following Duke of Westminster v Guild [1985] 1 QB 688 and Gordon and Teixeira v Selico Co Ltd (1986) 18 HLR 219On the other leaks, he found that CHA had carried out repairs in good time and that the flood from… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Absent negligence, the duty to repair only arose once the landlord was aware that damage had been caused.On the specific leaks, he found CHA were liable in respect of the February 2005 leak, as this could and should have been remedied by 8 April 2005, not 26 April, following Duke of Westminster v Guild [1985] 1 QB 688 and Gordon and Teixeira v Selico Co Ltd (1986) 18 HLR 219On the other leaks, he found that CHA had carried out repairs in good time and that the flood from… [read post]