Search for: "Taylor v. King"
Results 21 - 40
of 183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Federal Campaign Spending on Childcare Expenses Grows in 2022 Midterms OpenSecrets – Taylor Giorno | Published: 8/17/2022 Federal candidates are on track to spend more money on childcare ahead of 2022 midterms than in either of the previous two election cycles. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Taylor, 733 F.2d 1539 (11th Cir. 1984), abrogated on other grounds, see Scala v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
Samuel Taylor Coleridge, for example, famously conceptualized aesthetics as “poetic faith,” which requires “that willing suspension of disbelief for the moment” (see Tomko 2015). [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm
As we noted in an earlier post, however, in Dean Martyn Percy v The Dean & Chapter of the Cathedral Church of Christ in Oxford of the Foundation of King Henry VIII [2020] UKET 3310878/2019, Employment Judge Andrew Clarke QC concluded at a preliminary hearing that Dean Percy was an employee for the purposes of s. 83(2)(a) of the Equality Act 2010, though not an employee of the Crown. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In McGrain v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:52 pm
We reject Sawant's argument that this case is controlled by New York Times Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
(Burger King Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 2:42 am
I don't do these very often, but from time to time I see great value in letting experts share their views on important developments.The topics of today's podcast are all related to patentee's access to injunctive relief, also known as the King of Patent Remedies, with a particular focus on developments in Germany:the new German patent injunction statute (§ 139 PatG in its new form);the new six-month target for the Federal Patent Court of Germany's preliminary… [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 3:32 pm
” A year ago, EFF’s Executive Director, Cindy Cohn, shared these words in EFF's statement about the police killings of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am
A 1978 Supreme Court case, Monell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
Third Party Doctrine Supreme Court Decision in US v Jones US v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 11:26 am
No. 1J v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:17 am
Posted by Ruth V. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am
Of the making of lists of books, there shall be no end. [read post]
