Search for: "Taylor v. State of Mississippi*" Results 21 - 40 of 92
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
John Taylor of Caroline argued before the Supreme Court in Hylton that the carriage tax was a direct excise tax. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5684, Gates v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-8777, Taylor v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  On appeal to the supreme court of the state, the judgment was affirmed [. . .].'” 1921—Kirby v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:45 pm
It also has echoes in the attempts of some in state legislatures to criminalize dissent in new and creative ways. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
On 5 April 2016 Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of EZE Group Ltd v Taylor Marshall Ltd, (heard 23 March 2017) Events 28 April 2017, “Conference on Freedom of Expression Online,” Nicosia, Filoxenia Conference Centre, Cyprus Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Defteros v Google Inc & Anor [2017] VSC 158 John Dixon J granted summary judgment to Google Australia (Pty) Ltd in a defamation claim. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
As a result, HDOH ordered this product embargoed (not to be sold, purchased, or consumed) throughout the state, and the temporary closure of all Genki Sushi restaurants on Oahu and Kauai. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
The IWL can help you. https://t.co/iT3uTLpwrw -> Possible to decide copyright infringement claims in arbitration, states High Court of Bombay https://t.co/jMZBfkBMzV -> TPP A healthy agreement – The Washington Post https://t.co/x1zHL5fSB9 -> Patent Protection for Scientific Discoveries: Sequenom, Mayo, and the Meaning of § 101 https://t.co/59YbFoMhWy -> Conference on the Global Digital Content Market Opens at WIPO https://t.co/oa4oBXFonZ -> Holmes v. [read post]
    Farm employers are not subject to many federal labor laws and, in many states, are not included within the scope of the state workers' compensation provisions. [read post]