Search for: "Taylor v. U. S. Government"
Results 21 - 40
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 16-8777, Taylor v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:00 pm
Taylor, 529 U. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
U. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am
Ragosta, A Wall Between Secular Government and a Religious People, 26 Roger Williams U. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
§ 16(b), as incorporated into the Immigration and Nationality Act’s provisions governing an alien’s removal from the United States, is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:56 pm
Most of Russell’s paper concentrates on Simkins’ career at UT, as well as the 1954 decision (five weeks after Brown v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:21 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:34 pm
" Here's how the 2d DCA explained the Florida homestead law governing this point: Mr. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
[v] The U.N. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
SPBA’s petition set out two causes of action: 1. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
Taylor, 106 S.W.3d 692, 694 n.3 (Tex. 2003). [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm
SPBA’s petition set out two causes of action: 1. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
U. [read post]
