Search for: "Taylor v. U. S. Government"
Results 21 - 40
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
U. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:21 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:01 am
Xi’s government will increase its soybean purchases from Russia. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 10:51 pm
The Court rejected the State’s argument that the RJA was a mere procedural overlay that did not substantively change the law governing the death penalty. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:30 am
The other is that Texas v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 10:09 am
” Cites to Prager U v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
The majority began by noting that the “touchstone” of Fourth Amendment analysis is reasonableness, which requires a balancing of the government’s various interests against the individual’s privacy interests. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm
Ars Technica reports that the investigator suspects that the messages were stolen by a “government entity”. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
The 2017 amendments to Kentucky's business entity statutes. 56 U. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
Taylor issued a Decision and Order. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
Taylor, 106 S.W.3d 692, 694 n.3 (Tex. 2003). [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
§ 16(b), as incorporated into the Immigration and Nationality Act’s provisions governing an alien’s removal from the United States, is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
But the government waived its right to file a responsive brief, so unless [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 16-8777, Taylor v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
§ 16(b), as incorporated into the Immigration and Nationality Act’s provisions governing an alien’s removal from the United States, is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
