Search for: "Teamster Local Union No. 8, Appeal of"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2015, 8:37 am
Rush University Medical Center and Local 743 International Brotherhood of Teamsters, (13-RC-143495, 13-RC-143497; 13-RC-143510). [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 12:57 pm
Teamsters Local Union No. 31 as demonstrated in our blog entitled “Mitigate Your Losses or Lose Your Case”, the basic concept of how it can occur has remained somewhat unaltered. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:54 am
The district court’s conclusion that Sec. 303 “completely preempts” claims related to secondary boycotts ran counter to Local 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Union v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 8:04 am
On September 21, 2011, Teamsters Local 734 was certified as the bargaining representative for a unit of full-time and part-time sales drivers at Labriola Baking, a bakery and delivery company operating in the Chicago, Illinois area. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
Smith, Jr. dissented (Aircraft Service International, Inc v International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 117, January 10, 2014, Smith, N.R). [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
On February 8, 2012 the National Labor Relations Board found Noel Canning, a division of the Noel Corporation, in violation of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) for "refusing to reduce to writing and execute a collective bargaining agreement reached with Teamsters Local 760." [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:30 am
In this case, Noel Canning ("Canning") asked the Court to review a decision by the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB"), finding that Canning violated the National Labor Relations Act by refusing to sign a collective bargaining agreement reached with a Teamsters local union. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:58 am
Liu abused his discretion under Article 9 by relying solely on Teamsters local rates (ranging from $30.63-38.90 per hour) while ignoring the much lower average rate ($19.19 per hour) found in a survey conducted by his office. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:58 am
Liu abused his discretion under Article 9 by relying solely on Teamsters local rates (ranging from $30.63-38.90 per hour) while ignoring the much lower average rate ($19.19 per hour) found in a survey conducted by his office. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
Pursuant to collective bargaining agreements with the members of the Teamsters Union Local 560 (comprised of Marcal’s truck drivers), Marcal participated in a multiemployer defined benefit pension fund known as the Trucking Employees of North Jersey/Welfare Pension Fund (the “TENJ Pension Fund”). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
Pursuant to collective bargaining agreements with the members of the Teamsters Union Local 560 (comprised of Marcal’s truck drivers), Marcal participated in a multiemployer defined benefit pension fund known as the Trucking Employees of North Jersey/Welfare Pension Fund (the “TENJ Pension Fund”). [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 6:22 pm
.), requires the employer to recognize and bargain with Teamsters Local 150 pending the outcome of refusal to bargain charges filed at Region 20 of the NLRB. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Docket: 08-1214 Argument date: January 19, 2010 Question presented: In this case, the employer wants to sue over a collective bargaining agreement signed by a local union rather than its international. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
§706(8)(B) (1996 Supp.) [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:41 pm
Charges filed by Teamsters Locals 20 and 24; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (3). [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Charges filed by Teamsters Local 92; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (3). [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:17 am
Charge filed by Teamsters Local 177; complaint alleged violations of Section 8(a)(1) and (3). [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:12 pm
Accordingly, the Board dismissed the petition filed by Petitioner Teamsters Local 984. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
In that decision, the Board granted the General Counsel's and Union's motions for reconsideration and found that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act by withdrawing recognition from Plumbers Local 357, revising its job application procedure without notice to Local 357, and failing to provide a response to Local 357's information request. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:40 pm
Charge filed by General Teamsters (Excluding Mailers), State of Arizona, Local 104; complaint alleged violations of Section 8(a)(5) and (1). [read post]
