Search for: "Technical Publishing Co. v. Technology Publishing Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
By Andy Foreman A version of this article was originally published by Law360 on Oct. 21, 2020. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(IP Dragon) Columbia Sportswear successful in reducing counterfeits in China (IP Dragon) Shenyang Intermediate People’s Court orders New Apple Concept Technology to pay Apple 400,000 Yuan in damages for trade mark infringement and unfair competition (DeBund) 2386 IPR cases dealt with by Culture Administrations in Q3 (DeBund) Well-known trade marks can be recognised on basis of the products’ sales volumes (DeBund) Judicial Criteria for copyright cases (part 2) (DeBund)… [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06  OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Alfonso Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm by Keith Szeliga and Katie Calogero
., inaccurate, incomplete, or not current.[2] Part 1 of this article, published last month, addressed the contractor’s obligations under TINA, including the definition of cost or pricing data, the circumstances under which the contractor must disclose such data, and the adequacy of the contractor’s disclosure.[3] Part 2 of the article, set forth below, focuses on the Government’s remedies for alleged violations of TINA, including the elements of a defective pricing… [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
  The only changes from the version published in the subcommittee’s agenda book were:  (1) a new sentence in Note for Rule 26(b)(1) encouraging computer search technology (that is to say, predictive coding), and (2) modifying the Note for Rule 37(e) concerning the role of prejudice in subsection (e)(2). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
The author and Question Copyright thank the Wake Forest Journal of Business and Intellectual Property Law for allowing these portions to be published here under a Creative Commons Attribution license. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm by David M. McLain
This article discusses this new law’s technical provisions and examines its important implications for Colorado liability insurers, construction professionals, and construction defect claimants.In response to concerns regarding how courts were applyingthe insurance coverage case General Security Indemnity Co. of Arizona v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&amp;T Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Techdirt), A day in the life of an IP blog &ndash; WIPO magazine article about the blogging life of Jeremy Phillips: (Patent Baristas) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Droste effect packaging: (box vox), (Class 46), Against cyberproperty (and cybertrespass): (The Trademark Blog), Faberg&eacute; egg flip &ndash; Article on Faberg&eacute;&nbsp; brand and protection strategy: (Afro-IP), Domain name tasting proposal passed by ICANN&rsquo;s… [read post]