Search for: "Terry v. Unknown" Results 21 - 40 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2010, 3:30 am by Russ Bensing
Of the various exceptions to the 4th Amendment’s warrant requirement, there’s probably none more frequently used, and certainly none more frequently litigated, than the “stop and frisk” doctrine created 42 years ago in Terry v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:53 am by INFORRM
The short message of this case is to reinforce the point that Mr Justice Tugendhat made in Terry v Persons Unknown - the court will, in each privacy case, need to be properly satisfied that the interests of the public in open justice have been properly taken into account in re [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:55 am by INFORRM
” John Terry decision The decision of Mr Justice Tugendhat in the case of Terry v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB))has been interpreted by some sections of the media as a significant “reverse” step for privacy law. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 6:42 am by John Gregory
An English court has refused an injunction against the publication of the story of an alleged affair between a well-known football player and a teammate’s girlfriend: Terry v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:46 am by INFORRM
As the court made clear in Terry v Person Unknown[2010] EWHC 119 (QB), any application for such derogations should be supported by evidence in an application. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:03 am by Edward Smith
What happens then when an insured makes a claim alleging damage caused by an unknown water leak source? [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
Much remains unknown about Barrett’s views on significant issues that will likely come before the Supreme Court in the near future. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:20 am by INFORRM
  In his 2010 judgment in Terry (formerly LNS) v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB), [2010] EMLR 16) Mr Justice Tugendhat dismissed a claim for a super-injunction by the then England football captain John Terry, taking the opportunity to conduct a wide ranging survey of the relevant law and to criticise the approach of the claimant’s lawyers. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  In Prince Albert v Strange [1849] EWHC Ch J20, the Court restrained publication of private etchings drawn by Queen Victoria and her husband. [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:57 am by INFORRM
In Terry vs Persons Unknown (2010) the judge said that “Public domain applies where there has been sufficient prior publication so that there is nothing left which an injunction can, or should, protect”. [read post]