Search for: "The Cal Judicial Commission"
Results 21 - 40
of 402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2021, 11:48 am
San Mateo Community College District (2016) 1 Cal.5th 937, 957, my September 22, 2016 post on which can be found here.) [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 2:32 pm
Instead, he reasoned his CEQA claims were ripe for judicial review because the Commission’s hearing on the appeal would not be a true de novo proceeding. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
Cal.) and FTC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
Cal. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:59 pm
., (Supreme Court of California, March 2, 2009) 45 Cal.4th 992, 201 P.3d 472, 89 Cal.Rptr.3d 594, 09 Cal. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 7:11 pm
Duchine (Cal. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
A149735 (Cal. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:23 am
Cal. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
Superior Ct., 27 Cal. 3d 690, 702 (1980); see also Cal. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 5:20 pm
That's what judicial interpretation of a statute actually means.Justice Snauffer's critique would negate the whole point -- indeed, even the existence -- of the "avoid absurdity" doctrine. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:40 pm
County of Alameda (2012) 54 Cal.4th 281, 286.) [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
County of Alameda (2012) 54 Cal.4th 281, 291.) [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
The filtering discussion in the Commission’s proposal is deeply troubling. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:14 pm
City of Sierra Madre, ___ Cal. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm
Superior Court (1983) 33 Cal.3d 419, 441.) [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 7:32 pm
[15] Id.; see also CAL Article 1 [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 11:33 am
California Coastal Commission (2008) Cal. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
Cal. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 10:58 am
Cal. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:41 am
County of Napa (1995) 9 Cal.4th 763, 773.) [read post]
