Search for: "The Fair, Petitioner, v. Federal Trade Commission, Respondent"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
TexasIssue: (1) Whether a state habeas petitioner who raises a freestanding actual-innocence claim under the Due Process Clause, and who demonstrates actual innocence by at least a preponderance of the evidence, must instead make that showing by clear and convincing evidence to warrant a new trial; and (2) whether, in light of trial counsel’s errors, petitioner received ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of Strickland v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
Cedar Fair, L.P. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Amicus brief of Institute for Justice Motion of Federal Election Commission to dismiss or affirm Hart v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Stern v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 2:31 am
http://j.st/prB Garriott v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
GRIMSLEY, Appellant, v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Both sides have the opportunity to argue to the Solicitor General to explain why it is in the best interest of the United States either to have review be granted (the petitioner, the side seeking Supreme Court review) or denied (the respondent, who is opposing review). [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm
A. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
Arizona is without merit -- Florida's capital sentencing scheme does not violate federal constitutional rights to due process and fair jury trial -- Death penalty is proportionateRENALDO DEVON McGIRTH, Appellant, v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
ARTHUR JAMES CONLAN, Appellee. 4th District.Evidence -- Hearsay -- For purposes of statute requiring commission to investigate certain election law violations after having received sworn complaint or information reported to commission by Division of Elections and further providing that sworn complaint must be based upon personal information or information other than hearsay, administrative law judge properly interpreted “hearsay” according to its common usage, rather… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
” The respondent: “Guilty. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Brief amicus curiae of United States Petition for certiorari (08-1547) Petitioner's reply (08-1557) Brief amicus curiae of Commissioned Officers Association of the United States Public Health Service, Inc. (08-1547) Docket: 08-1536 Title: Palazzo v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP ADR Blog) David Brown discusses global growth in IP (IP Solutions) Global - Trade Marks / Brands How to respond to cease and desist orders from trademark owners (IP ADR Blog) Artists and brands – ad-supported CD releases (IP finance) The questionable notion of the national brand (IP finance) Global - Patents Seeing the forrest: considering worldwide patent trends (Patently-O) PCT v 2.0 on the anvil? [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Issue: Whether a federal court exercising its habeas jurisdiction, as confirmed by Boumediene v. [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
Opinion below (2nd Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition for respondent Penguin Group Brief in opposition for Estate Respondents Petitioner's reply Brief amici curiae of Professors Peter S. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor)… [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 2:12 pm
Eurodif and United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 1:19 am
The amount of commission income received by petitioner in 1981, therefore, is to be determined on the basis of the fair market value of the trade units petitioner received as commissions in 1981. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
To the extent that the attorney general's brief addressed the point on changes in health insurance for judges, it did so because the petitioner judges addressed that cause of action against all respondents, including the Legislature and the governor. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:24 am
The parties' briefs are available here; the brief of the United States is available here.The Federal Trade Commission's jurisdiction over the advertising and testing of tar and nicotine levels in cigarettes derives from Section 45(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits "unfair methods of competition…and unfair and deceptive acts or practices in or affecting… [read post]
