Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Bybee"
Results 21 - 40
of 105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
Yesterday, thirteen judges of the Fourth Circuit sitting en banc heard argument in IRAP v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit declined to grant an en banc rehearing in Washington v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:24 pm
Granting plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order in Hawaii v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 1:12 pm
”) United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
Affecting thousands of people every year.It also involves an important right. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:04 pm
This was largely because the California Supreme Court ordered a hearing on the petitioner's claim under People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
At sentencing, counsel filed a motion under People v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:27 pm
The opinion affirms an earlier district court ruling in Doe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 1:20 pm
Despite the fact that this promise doesn't have anything near the status of law, Judge Bybee finds it credible, and holds that the case is moot. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 10:04 am
Lucy Koh) 37% FTC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:48 pm
It's the battle of two very bright people mutually articulating eminently reasonable arguments. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 11:54 am
The Ninth Circuit appeal, Joffe v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 11:54 am
The Ninth Circuit appeal, Joffe v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
I think some people dismissed my post completely just based on its title—the reasoning didn’t matter since the conclusions weren’t what those people wanted to hear. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:07 pm
Bush, Hamdan v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
31 May 2013, 9:06 am
(See Santos-Lemus v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:11 am
Smith v. [read post]
