Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Price"
Results 21 - 40
of 4,397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2018, 7:00 am
The court concluded that the defendants had merely savvily capitalized on a legitimate trading opportunity, not manipulated the market, because the CFTC did not show that the defendants created an artificial price (CFTC v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 5:00 am
Beck v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 12:00 pm
The People concede that '[r]eview of the record does not demonstrate that the prosecutor [ever] asked Detective Price whether [the victim] described the touching of her top over her clothing to have happened more than once.' (Italics added.) [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 11:53 am
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:24 pm
I think the American people are tired of that. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONMatter of People of the State of New York v Tyson Foods, Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 5:32 pm
Starting this month, over 1.7 million people in Oregon will be sent the first of two checks totaling at least $185. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 3:57 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 8:10 am
Administrative Law — Public Service Commission — Price for electricity This case concerns a question regarding charges for electricity. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 3:50 pm
In fact, I think many people would thank you. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
But how does one in fact apply the thing to people who've been in custody the whole time? [read post]
9 May 2012, 12:05 pm
In People v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 3:24 pm
Stitt & Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
The price is too high.Now, in this particular case, I agree that the failure to provide post-seizure notice in the particular manner required by state law doesn't require suppression or invalidation of the conviction. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 6:59 pm
Ahmed v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:49 pm
You'd rather have the marketplace decide; on price, on quality of service, etc. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 8:06 am
The patents are owned by Mr Philip Price of Preston and licensed to Mr Price's company, Surpawall. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:36 am
Arizona v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:37 pm
Three years ago, when the Court of Appeal struck down Section 1814 of the Insurance Code, which prohibits bail companies from paying inmates from referring potential customers, as an unconstitutional infringement of free speech, I was skeptical, saying (among other things):Letting bail agents make "arrangements" with inmates to refer clients to 'em clearly, in my view, distorts the marketplace, and punishing such conduct will lead to a marketplace more closely (albeit admittedly still… [read post]
