Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Raby" Results 21 - 25 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2009, 8:09 am by Amy A. Breyer
I would like to take this opportunity to offer a counterpoint.The AVMA begins by acknowledging that many people think of their animals as more than property but then warns that permitting non-economic damages for their negligent harm would cause veterinary insurance premiums to rise, rabies to become prevalent, animals to be abandoned, prices to increase on everything from pet supplies to auto insurance, and police officers to be hesitant to shoot rabid animals.The authors,… [read post]