Search for: "The People v. Officer" Results 21 - 40 of 22,806
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am by Scott Bomboy
The Supreme Court, however, vacated the decision in April 2021 after Trump left office. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:48 am by Peter A. Mahler
I would guess most people hearing that would think a judge hearing the dissolution case wouldn’t hesitate to grant the petition and appoint a receiver to wind down and liquidate the business. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm by Josh Blackman
And I'm sure there were many people inside the Beltway who would have loved free tickets to her concert at FedEx field. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
Several people counseled him against a second clerkship especially with a “progressive” judge. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[27] Other unusual vehicles for E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks have included unpasteurized juices, yogurt, dried salami, mayonnaise, raw milk, game meats, sprouts, and raw cookie dough.[28] According to a recent study, an estimated 93,094 illnesses are due to domestically acquired E. coli O157:H7 each year in the United… [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am by Michael Oykhman
” It may be “stored” even if the accused places them temporarily out of sight with the intention of retrieving them later… To meet the third criterion (the accused acted “in a careless manner or without reasonable precautions for the safety of other persons”), the Crown must show that the accused acted in a way which caused a risk to people or property (see: R v Batty, 2014 ONCA 620 (CanLII)). [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am by Michael Oykhman
Regarding a reasonable expectation of privacy, a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 noted that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area, location or circumstance if the person does not expect to be secretly recorded or observed. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
Child pornography is addressed under section 163.1 (1) of the Criminal Code of Canada (the “Code”). [read post]