Search for: "Thomas v. DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Accountability, Inc. v Cuomo, 167 AD3d 1406, 1409 [3d Dept 2018], appeal dismissed 33 NY3d 993 [2019], lv dismissed & denied 34 NY3d 961 [2019]). [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Ricotta & Marks, P.C., Long Island City, NY (Thomas A. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Ricotta & Marks, P.C., Long Island City, NY (Thomas A. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am
Justice Thomas concurred in part. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm
(See also Matter of Benjamin Thomas v Comm. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
Dept. of Child Services, and Child Advocates, Inc [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
County of Nassau v Civil Service Employees Association, decision posted on the Internet at http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2021/2021_01748.htm; 2. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
County of Nassau v Civil Service Employees Association, decision posted on the Internet at http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2021/2021_01748.htm; 2. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
By Thomas A. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 11:52 am
Div. 3d Dept. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:08 am
& Plastics Corp., 75 AD2d 720 [1980]; Matter of Roland [Deak], 10 AD2d 263, 265 [1960]) or to preserve evidence for a forthcoming lawsuit (see generally Matter of Thomas v New York City Tr. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 5:52 pm
Dept. of Child Svcs. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 7:34 am
The Court also left intact its landmark decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
And I urge you not to miss the paragraph they ended with: In Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
