Search for: "Thomas v. The Regents of the University of California" Results 21 - 40 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2011, 12:27 pm by Stephen Wermiel
After the Court narrowly permitted the use of race in admissions by a splintered five-four decision in 1978 in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 10:15 am by Adam Feldman
Regents of the University of California. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:44 pm by Amy Howe
Strawbridge urged the justices to overrule Grutter and Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
Although it was a unanimous judgment, Alito was joined by just four other Justices (Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Jackson). [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:35 am by Erin Miller
”  More significant was his draft opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm by Stuart Taylor
Unless the next two Supreme Court appointees are strong opponents of racial preferences — a most unlikely prospect — the Court’s role since the 1978 Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Most puzzling is City of Newport Beach, California v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The first university case involving affirmative action was in 1978 in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:59 am by jonathanturley
For decades, universities have avoided the type of outright quota the court held unconstitutional in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 11:00 am by Tiffany Scaramucci
The Supreme Court has historically permitted the limited use of race-based college admissions programs, beginning 45 years ago in the Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:01 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage of yesterday’s second argument, Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:12 am by J. Gordon Hylton
On two occasions, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:45 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Drake, in a letter to the University of California Board of Regents obtained by The Times, said the way the incident was handled requires an outside inquiry. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm by Gail Heriot and John Eastman
The problem is that the reasons cited by academics – like past societal discrimination or the need for more minority professionals – have already been rejected as unconstitutional in Justice Powell’s controlling opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Regents of the University of California, in which the court held that the government’s decision to terminate the DACA program violated the procedural requirements prescribed for administrative agencies, along with her dissents in other cases involving “discrimination at the hands of government actors,” “exposes the Roberts Court as unwilling to understand or accept how minority communities are actually discriminated against today. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 8:39 am
Merely fyi, IPBiz includes some employment rates, at graduation, for graduates of certain law schools, taken from Barron's Guide to Law Schools, 17th edition (2007)-->University of Chicago (law school of Jon Dudas and LBE, among others): 99%University of Akron: 60%University of Alabama: 60%University of Arizona: 65%University of Arkansas: 48%University of California, Hastings: 61%University of… [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
Regents of the University of California, in which the court held that the government’s decision to terminate the DACA program, which allowed undocumented young people brought to this country as children to apply for protection from deportation, violated the procedural requirements prescribed for administrative agencies. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 9:44 am by Adam Feldman
Regents of the University of California, involving the Trump administration’s decision to unwind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA; and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]