Search for: "Tillman v. Tillman" Results 21 - 40 of 388
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A Reality Check on "Officers of the United States" at the Founding
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Trump prioritized this argument in his briefs to the Court, drawing primarily on the scholarship of Seth Barrett Tillman and his co-author, Josh Blackman. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Professor Mark Graber Lectures Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson About White Supremacy
13 Feb 2024, 10:02 am by Josh Blackman
We, Blackman and Tillman, are both realists. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Why Does The Phrase "Not Herein Otherwise Provided For" Appear In The Appointments Clause?
10 Feb 2024, 11:12 pm by Josh Blackman
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] A Reply To Sam Bray: The Drafting History of the Impeachment Clause
10 Feb 2024, 10:28 pm by Josh Blackman
That day, a motion was made to add "[t]he [V]ice-President and other Civil officers of the U. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part IV: Justice Sotomayor and Kagan get the line between national power and federalism
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Josh Blackman
There was a tension in yesterday's oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part III: Justice Kavanaugh Gets Griffin's Case  and Justice Barrett gets FedCourts
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm by Josh Blackman
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part II: Justice Jackson Gets "Office under the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part I: Justice Gorsuch Gets "Officers of the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am by Josh Blackman
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Steven Calabresi] Offices Under the United States and the Oral Argument in Trump v. Anderson
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm by Steven Calabresi
Anderson strongly suggests a Trump victory on the grounds advanced heroically by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A packed courtroom for the Trump ballot case
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Term Limits v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
[Josh Blackman] Attending Oral Argument in Trump v. Anderson
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
Stay tuned.The post Attending Oral Argument in <i>Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] "Seven Questions on Section 3: A Response to Professor Kurt Lash"
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Ilya Somin] C-SPAN Washington Journal Appearance on the Trump Section 3 Case
8 Feb 2024, 6:19 am by Ilya Somin
(Joe Ravi/Wikimedia/CC-BY-SA 3.0)Today, the Supreme Court will hold oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] All Blackman-Tillman Articles, Presentations, Amicus Briefs, Commentary, and Blog posts on Section 3 and Insurrection
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Griswold v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] A Reply to Peter Keisler and Richard Bernstein, and Michael Luttig, on Section 3
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Tillman in the Times: "A Legal Outsider, an Offbeat Theory and the Fate of the 2024 Election"
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am by Josh Blackman
"] Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
“In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents’ Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant’s VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern; Justice Scalia erred because there are no ‘Officers of the United States’ appointed outside Article II, Section II”
4 Feb 2024, 8:53 pm by Howard Bashman
“In Trump v. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Fund v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  And strangely, Part II-A of Professor Tillman’s brief devotes six pages to arguing (mistakenly) that “[i]n the Constitution of 1788, the President did not hold an ‘Office … under the United States,'” without arguing that the same is true in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment—let alone that the alleged limited meaning of that phrase in 1788 is a reason for reversing the Colorado Supreme Court.) [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/