Search for: "Titus v. Titus" Results 21 - 40 of 122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2019, 11:51 am by Erin Hustings
” On the other hand, Judge Roger Titus of the district of Maryland wrote, in CASA de Maryland v. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Court of Appeal applied Ontario’s test for unconscionability (which differs slightly from other jurisdictions, such as in Douez), based on Titus v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee organization representing… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee organization representing… [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 10:00 am by Liisa Speaker
The MCOA affirmed his convictions in 2004 in People v Titus, (Docket No. 243642). [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:55 pm by Liisa Speaker
There is an exception (Estes v Titus, 481 Mich 573 (2008)) when fraud is raised, third parties can be added if they conspired with one of the parties to defraud the other spouse of a property interest.3. [read post]
13 May 2015, 3:09 am
This, together with other two questions, is what the Bundesgerichtshof (German Federal Court of Justice) asked [here] our beloved Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to clarify in Dimensione Direct Sales srl and Michele Labianca v Knoll International SpA, C-516/13.This morning the CJEU issued its 36-paragraph decision, ruling that the right of distribution encompasses the right to prevent "an offer for sale or a targeted advertisement of the original… [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 2:20 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Barbara's brother Titus confronted Trottie with a .380 pistol, at which point Trottie departed. [read post]