Search for: "Tobacco Express, II, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2023, 7:20 am
First, in Part II, I argue that erotic-expression taxes are indeed content-discriminatory and should be evaluated under strict scrutiny. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 504 F.Supp.2d 939, 947 (S.D.Cal.2007) (noting split of authority but finding that, with recent Proposition 64 reforms, the UCL now requires reliance); Anunziato v. eMachines, Inc., 402 F.Supp.2d 1133, 1137-39 (C.D.Cal.2005) (declining to read a reliance requirement into the UCL); In re Tobacco II Cases, 146 P.3d 1250 (2006) (granting petition for review on issue of whether UCL requires reliance); Def.'s Opp'n n. 5; Pl.'s Reply… [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Reynolds Tobacco Company v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:36 am
Johnson & Johnson, Inc., 2013 WL 1629191 (N.D. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 713 A.2d 381 (N.H.1998), a tobacco case where the plaintiff sought to impose absolute liability. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
Part 1 & II: deja vu? [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:32 am
Griffith (R-VA), transfers marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule II of the CSA. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:46 am
Fabricut, Inc. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
: Alcon Inc v Bausch & Lomb (Australia) Pty Ltd (ipwars) FCA: Infringing a registered design? [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
II. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
II. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:01 am
Chobani, Inc., 2013 WL 3703981 (N.D. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
My UCLA School of Law students Aaron Boudaie, Eimile Nolan, and Simon Ruhland and I had filed an amicus brief, on behalf of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), PEN American Center, Inc. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Koch Industries, Inc., 273 F. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Time, Inc., 68 F.3d 285 (9th Cir. 1995), upheld the dismissal of UCL and FAL claims, rejecting as unpersuasive the plaintiff’s argument that readers will read only the large print on a promotion document and “ignore the qualifying language in small print. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Anthem, Inc.[25] But the evidence is plenty. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:24 pm
" Slip op., at 17, relying on In re Tobacco II Cases (2009) 46 Cal.4th 298, 318. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
[II.] [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
II. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 12:58 am
Tobacco companies created the fund to avoid a constitutional challenge to a law drastically lowering the appeal bond needed to challenge a landmark $145 billion jury award. [read post]