Search for: "Tomko v. State"
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2022, 3:22 am
These allegations fail to remedy the deficiencies in the original complaint regarding the element of intentional deceit (see Lavelle-Tomko v Aswad & Ingraham, 191 AD3d 1142, 1147 [3d Dept 2021] [ denying a motion to amend a complaint to plead a cause of action under Judiciary Law § 487 where the proposed amendment failed to plead facts tending to prove the attorney’s intent to deceive]; Genger v Genger, 135 AD3d 454,454 [1st Dept 2016], Iv denied 27 NY3d 912… [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:08 pm
Harris v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:50 pm
The HITECH Act empowers a state attorney general to sue covered entities or business associates engaging in HIPAA violations that harms citizens of the state for statutory damages equal to the sum of the number of violations multiplied by 100 up to a maximum of $25,000 per calendar year plus attorneys fees and costs On January 13, 2010 Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal sued Health Net of Connecticut, Inc. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 17, 2009 US v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
To mark this celebration of Sandy’s 40 years at the University of Texas, I want to argue that constitutional faith provides a path back to democracy in the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:55 am
State Attorney General Lawsuit Exposures Covered Entities and their business associates now also need to be concerned about the potential that a state Attorney General may bring civil suit to remedy damages caused to state citizens by a breach of HIPAA. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:23 pm
The Struthers Industries decision comes on the heels of EBSA’s success in Solis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
We join the officers and directors of the State Bar in expressing our deepest sympathy. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]
