Search for: "Tomlinson v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2012, 9:04 am
In Caminiti v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
FN4 The newsletter stated that Mr. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
Given the differing traditions from which its judges are drawn, and bearing in mind that the court has not regarded the award of just satisfaction as its principal concern, it is not altogether surprising that it has generally dealt with the subject relatively briefly, and has offered little explanation of its reasons for awarding particular amounts or for declining to make an award”, per Lord Reed, Regina (Faulkner) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] 2 AC 254 [34]. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm
The question is not whether some readers would have misunderstood the satire as stating facts but whether the average or reasonable reader would have come to that view. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:25 pm
Tomlinson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:39 pm
The crucial evidence was that of Ms Barber concerning her state of mind when she wrote the words complained of. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:55 am
The Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights today gave judgment in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom (Judgment of 10 May 2011). [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
The defendant relied on the judgment of Lord Dyson in the Supreme Court case of R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] 1 AC 245 [101]), in which he disapproved the concept of “vindicatory damages”. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:03 pm
45835/05, § 68, 31 July 2012; Dammann v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Tomlinson & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2010] UKSC 8 This is the Supreme Court judgment on the appeal from the Court of Appeal of what was then called Ali & Ibrahim v Birmingham City Council [2008] EWCA 1228 [our report here]. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Tomlinson & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2010] UKSC 8 This is the Supreme Court judgment on the appeal from the Court of Appeal of what was then called Ali & Ibrahim v Birmingham City Council [2008] EWCA 1228 [our report here]. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a specialist in media and information law at Matrix Chambers and an editor of Inforrm. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:25 pm
Tomlinson v. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm
It stated that the claimant had been passing confidential information to ex-employees of CSP who were working for a rival agency and that criminal proceedings were being considered (for the full text, see [4]). [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:52 am
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix chambers and an editor of Inforrm [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
This is the first successful legal challenge to AFR technology and an important decision in relation to the regulation of state surveillance. [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 9:15 am
Hugh Tomlinson KC is a member of the Matrix Chambers media and information group and an editor of Inforrm. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:13 pm
It emphasised the importance of discussion around the State’s monopoly on the use of force, but set that against P. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:33 pm
That exercise is primarily a function of national courts, in respect of which states enjoy a margin of appreciation, subject to the supervision of the Strasbourg Court [96] – [97]. [read post]
