Search for: "Tomlinson v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 28 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
Civil Prac & Remedies Code §22.021(2)(B)) extends protection to scholars; whilst the Californian Court of Appeals famously, in O’Grady v Superior Court 44 Cal Rptr 3d 72 (Cal Ct App 2006), interpreted the word ‘periodical’ to find that online journals were protected by state shield laws. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:55 am
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently ruled against a landowner seeking a prescriptive easement over property owned by the Township of Guelph/Eramosa for lack of evidence. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:55 am
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently ruled against a landowner seeking a prescriptive easement over property owned by the Township of Guelph/Eramosa for lack of evidence. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:49 am by Andrew Dickinson
Harding v Wealands [2007] 1 AC 1, under the pre-existing English rules of applicable law). [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Adam Wagner
As Tomlinson argues: … the Court of Human Rights has recognised that there can be a right to access to official information. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:00 pm
Superior Court (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 365 and Dunlap v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 7:00 am
Superior Court, S119334 and Murphy v. [read post]