Search for: "Toni Garland"
Results 21 - 40
of 119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2018, 4:01 am
Circuit and President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Chief Judge Merrick Garland. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
” At The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports that “Yale Law School professor Akhil Amar said Tuesday he will speak in favor of the U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 8:02 pm
Plus: Christopher Scalia Twitter thread on why the “theory that Trump picked him because he’d protect the president from indictment” is “nonsense”; Tony Mauro. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
Shelby Garland and Larry Blocho have Cornell’s preview, and Subscript’s graphic explainer is here. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
Another preview comes from Shelby Garland and Jonathan Kim at Cornell. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:14 am
” At The Litigation Daily (subscription required), Tony Mauro looks back at “one of the few cases in which the high court has ruled on the pardon power: the 1866 decision in Ex Parte Garland, involving one of the most prolific—and acerbic—advocates before the court: Augustus Garland. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:27 am
” Amy Howe covers the expiration of Garland’s nomination for this blog. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 am
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Tony Francois highlights Foster v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:22 am
” In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro remarks on the spate of personal jurisdiction litigation before the court this term, noting that the U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 5:48 am
Tony Mauro shares our own Harry Graff's enthusiasm for Loving. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:38 am
” Advice and Consent (podcast) features a discussion about whether Senate Democrats might register their dissent over Republican treatment of Chief Judge Merrick Garland by filibustering a Trump nomination. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:57 am
” At CNN, Ariane de Vogue reports that after Chief Judge Merrick Garland returns to his job on the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
’” Lyle Denniston for Constitution Daily reports on attempts by Oregon Senator Jeff Merkley to pressure GOP leadership to vote on Chief Judge Merrick Garland’s nomination. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:38 am
” At Jost on Justice, Ken Jost weighs in on the election, noting that “the Democrats’ basic premise that Republicans would pay a price for obstructing President Obama’s nomination of veteran federal appeals court judge Merrick Garland for the high court was proven to be wrong, flatly wrong. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am
” At The Hill, Alexander Bolton reports that “Hillary Clinton will face a tough decision on the Supreme Court if she wins the presidency on Tuesday,” because she will have to choose between re-nominating Chief Judge Merrick Garland or succumbing to pressure from the left “to jettison Obama’s centrist nominee and pick a younger and more liberal judge. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 4:42 am
” And at NPR, Wade Goodwyn and Nina Totenberg assess the political landscape and question whether “this continued refusal to act on the Garland nomination” is “a smart move for conservatives. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
” The editorial board of USA Today weigh in on the stalemate over the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland, maintaining that “Senate Republicans are shirking their constitutional responsibility to advise and consent on judicial nominations. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 5:20 am
” In the Harvard Business Review, Avinash Dixit and David McAdams apply game theory to the Merrick Garland nomination stalemate, identifying several “strategic obstacles” that make it likely make it likely “that Garland will not be confirmed as a Supreme Court justice during the Obama presidency, despite his qualifications as an accomplished jurist and consensus nominee. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:04 pm
As Tony Mauro discussed in the National Law Journal last week, without Scalia, the court is less likely to continue its push against class-action litigation and in support of mandatory-arbitration clauses. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:45 am
” For Law.com (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports on comments made by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan at the tail end of the Court’s summer recess. [read post]
