Search for: "Tonja"
Results 21 - 40
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2021, 4:30 am
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: Reading the tea leaves: Remaining cases as of June 26 (Amy Howe, Howe on the Court) Clarence Thomas says federal laws against marijuana may no longer be necessary (Pete Williams, NBC News) This Supreme Court guards the First Amendment — and neglects the Fourth (Tonja Jacobi, The Washington Post) What’s Dividing the Supreme Court’s Conservatives? [read post]
21 May 2021, 4:00 am
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Tonja Jacobi, professor of law at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, to discuss packing the Supreme Court, the politicization of the High Court, potential reform, and next steps. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:21 pm
(For a nice explanation of Principal Component Analysis and similar techniques in the context of Supreme Court opinions, see this great article by Joshua Fischman and Tonja Jacobi.) [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:22 am
Other Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: The Supreme Court We Need (Linda Greenhouse, The New York Review of Books) The Dishonesty of Amy Coney Barrett’s “Textualist” Pose (Simon Lazarus, The New Republic) The Most Useless Job Interview Ever (David Cohen, Rolling Stone) Barrett Won’t Pull Away From Trump’s Coattails (Kenneth Jost, Jost on Justice) Week Two of the 2020 Supreme Court Term: Oral Argument Analysis (Tonja Jacobi &… [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 8:12 am
The new Courts Law essay comes from Adam Steinman (Alabama) reviewing Tonja Jacobi & Matthew Sag, Taking Laughter Seriously at the Supreme Court, 72 Vand. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 6:59 am
I review a recent article by Tonja Jacobi & Matthew Sag, Taking Laughter Seriously at the Supreme Court, 72 Vand. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 3:30 am
Tonja Jacobi & Matthew Sag, Taking Laughter Seriously at the Supreme Court, 72 Vand. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:59 am
” Briefly: In op-ed for The New York Times, Leah Litman and Tonja Jacobi maintain that during the recent telephonic arguments at the Supreme Court, for which the chief justice served as timekeeper, Roberts’ “uneven application of the rules was … gendered and ideological, as interruptions have been in previous courts. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:52 pm
” Law professors Leah Litman and Tonja Jacobi have this essay online at The New York Times. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:31 am
"Oral argument is one transparent part of the court process," said Tonja Jacobi of Northwestern University Law School, who studies the court's oral arguments. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 11:48 am
” The request was supported by a “friend of the court” brief by Harmony Allen and Tonja Schultz – the victims of Collins and Daniels. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 3:47 am
” At The Washington Post (subscription required), Tonja Jacobi and others note that “[n]ine cases into the court’s current term, which began Oct. 7, the justices are observing a new rule that requires them to ‘generally’ hold their fire during the first 120 seconds of oral argument, allowing attorneys to have their say in a ‘quiet zone’ before the justices interrupt with their questions and comments. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:55 am
” Law professor Tonja Jacobi, professor Timothy R. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 10:06 am
“Textualism as pretext in the LGBTQ discrimination cases”: Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag have this post at the “SCOTUS OA” blog. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 4:03 am
” Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag analyze the arguments at SCOTUS OA. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 3:55 am
At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag analyze last week’s oral argument in Kahler v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:15 pm
Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag’s research demonstrates that the justices now speak more during oral argument than they did in the past, while the parties speak less. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am
Briefly: At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag “continue to examine the role of interruption at oral argument in the 2018 Term,” concluding that “seniority … seems to be an important factor in this Term’s judicial interactions. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:06 am
At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag write that “an analysis of justice to justice interruptions from the 2018 Term suggests” that the “gender imbalance in the rate of interruptions of female justices versus male justices” has been reduced. [read post]
8 May 2019, 3:45 am
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag analyze participation by advocates in Supreme Court arguments this term, concluding that “the Supreme Court Bar is still largely a ‘boys club’”: “[W]omen account for 17.7% of Supreme Court advocates in OT2018,” and “when they do get a chance to appear, they are not given as much chance to actually speak. [read post]
