Search for: "Trans Carriers Inc" Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2017, 12:39 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Trans World Airlines, Inc., 504 U.S. 374, 378-79 (1992), because the Connecticut statute does not “relate[] to rates, routes or services [of airlines],” Memorandum of Decision, p. 43; and (3) the Airport and Airway Improvement Act, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
Herr Foods, Inc., the plaintiff alleged that Herr’s packaged snacks were mislabeled as free from preservatives, MSG and trans fat, and as “all natural. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:25 am by Lindsay Colvin Stone
Prior to Groff, courts evaluated whether a requested accommodation imposed an “undue burden” under the test set by the Supreme Court in the 1977 case Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 12:52 am
ALM Privacy Policy / Contact Us © 2007 ALM Properties, Inc. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:39 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Trans World Airlines, Inc., 504 U.S. 374, 378-79 (1992), because the Connecticut statute does not “relate[] to rates, routes or services [of airlines],” Memorandum of Decision, p. 43; and (3) the Airport and Airway Improvement Act, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
After attending the PLUS D&O Symposium  some years ago, several colleagues at Partner Re thought it might be worthwhile to provide D&O insurance professionals with historical overview of the evolution of Directors and Officers insurance (D&O) in the US marketplace. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
I look forward to working with our airline carriers and airport operators to further upgrade our aviation infrastructure and ensure good jobs and quality air transit for New York's economy. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 7:35 am by Adam Chan
On Jan. 2, 2018, it was announced that CFIUS had rejected Ant Financial’s takeover of U.S. money transfer company MoneyGram International Inc. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
" The appellate court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little (if anything) even when told about repeat offenders, re-affirming the jury decision that sided with BMG and awarded $25 million against Cox when they found the broadband carrier liable for piracy by its subscribers, even if over turning that decision. [read post]