Search for: "True v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner" Results 21 - 40 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 pm
” “The Commission’s report documents the Chinese government’s continued use the tools of authoritarian governance to centralize power, restrict basic human rights, and maintain majoritarian social control,” said CECC Cochair McGovern. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 1:24 am by Jason C. Gavejian
This is especially true as the list of states protecting legislation to protect social media privacy continues to grow. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) On April 8, 2014, the European Court of Justice, sitting as the Grand Chamber, delivered its decision in Digital Rights Ireland Ltd (C‑293/12) v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Commissioner of the Garda Síochána, Ireland, The Attorney General. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Bounty was a pregnancy and support club that went into administration in 2020 following an investigation by the Information Commissioner in April 2019, which found that Bounty’s business model was largely based on harvesting data from expectant mothers in order to sell the data on to third parties. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Within days of the BC filing, CSC Commissioner Don Head issued a statement to the media that the CSC was considering a “new model” for segregation. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
  The Jude found that Rooney’s post was “substantially true. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
  RUSSIA, UKRAINE – MARIUPOL Thousands of civilians have been killed in the south-eastern city of Mariupol, and “the true scale” of alleged atrocities is yet to be revealed, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet has said. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am by Ryan Goodman
Part of Just Security’s coverage of the Manhattan DA investigation and work on accountability and corruption. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance On 15 May 2024, a London Administrative Court handed down its judgment in the case of ADL & Ors v SSHD [2024] EWHC 994 (Admin). [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
More broadly, income subject to substantial information reporting requirements includes pensions, annuities, interest income, dividend income, unemployment compensation, and taxable Social Security benefits. [read post]
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm by Ben Sperry
” This is a major decision, and will have implications for free speech online, as the Court must soon consider similar facts in the social-media context in Murthy v. [read post]