Search for: "Tudor v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
Despite “the difficulty & awkwardness of operating by force on the collective will of a State,” armed federal intervention in state affairs must be permitted.[4]During the Convention, on three different occasions, Madison tried to grant the federal government this absolute “negative” (what we now call a veto) over all state legislation. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Gawker and Sheldon v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:58 pm
(See also Reno v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 3:39 pm
ACLU, Ashcroft v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:16 am
Tudor v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am
London Borough of Brent v Tudor [2013] EWCA Civ 157This was an appeal of a Circuit Judge’s finding that LB Brent’s possession claim under Ground 16, Schedule 2 Housing Act 1985 failed because the property was reasonably needed to accommodate those living there. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am
London Borough of Brent v Tudor [2013] EWCA Civ 157This was an appeal of a Circuit Judge’s finding that LB Brent’s possession claim under Ground 16, Schedule 2 Housing Act 1985 failed because the property was reasonably needed to accommodate those living there. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:45 pm
Georgiacarry.org, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:38 pm
Notwithstanding recent court decisions like Humana Medical Plan v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:37 am
Abbott Flanders v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:32 am
The case is Avocet Industrial Estates LLP v Merol Ltd and Tudor Rose International Ltd and it raises a number of points which will be of interest to investors and those managing investment property.Payments by cheque There was an implied agreement that payment could be made by cheque because some payments had been made by cheque (although recent payments were made by BACS). [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 6:12 pm
Ed. 2d 973 (1980); Levine v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 12:01 am
Henry v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:56 am
This Court also took note of the principle stated in White & Tudor’s Leading Case in Equity volume 18th edition at p.444 – wherein it is stated, “Election is the obligation imposed upon a party by Courts of equity to choose between two inconsistent or alternative rights or claims in cases where there is clear intention of the person from whom he derives one that he should not enjoy both… That he who accepts a benefit under a deed or will… [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 4:10 am
Zipursky, Snyder v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:42 am
The panel found in Sullivan v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm
Tudor, 2010 U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 3:15 am
Mr and Mrs Patel ran a newsagent on Tudor Street opposite the main entrance of the Inner Temple and thus familiar to most members of the bar. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 8:54 am
Favorite TV programs: Mythbusters, Lost, The Tudors and Meet the Press. [read post]
