Search for: "Tyre v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 91
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2020, 12:08 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Credit for time served Tyree Kevin Crawford filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County in which he alleged that his sentence to life imprisonment, all but 40 years suspended, for first-degree murder was illegal because the court had failed to ... [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:19 pm by Dennis Crouch
General Tire & Rubber Co v Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co Limited [1972] RPC 457. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am by Alex Woolgar
TheInfluence of Member State Submissions on Copyright Law” (forthcoming Modern LawReview)]This paper presented a really fascinating look at the "explosion" of copyright jurisprudence at the CJEU. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Bridgestone opposition two tyred, fell flat | Public interest in Plant Variety Rights. [read post]
20 May 2018, 2:13 pm
Bridgestone opposition two tyred, fell flat | Public interest in Plant Variety Rights. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
Making sense of trade mark conflict in the EUTM systemKatfriend Darren Meale reports on the CJEU decision Continental Reifen Deutschland v Compagnie generale des etablissements Michelinwhich upheld tyre giant Continental’s appeal against Michelin, concerning their stylised registered mark ‘X’.The challenge of protecting a database without a sui generis right, this time from SingaporeKat friends Lau Kok Keng, Nicholas Lauw and Jiamin Leow… [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Demonstrate familiarity with the legal regulation of CSR in the United States and selected other states, with a focus on the law of charitable giving and the emerging disclosure and reporting laws4. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  Details of the mechanism of the alleged fraud can be found in the Opinions of Lord Tyre, [2015] CSOH 150, and Lord Doherty, [2016] CSOH 107. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 5:12 am by SHG
The opening paragraph of Judge Eugene Pigott’s opinion in People v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 2:58 am by Karen Ainslie
 Furthermore, in Apollo Tyres SA (Pty) Ltd v CCMA and others (2013) 34 ILJ 1120 (LAC) the court noted that the distinction between remuneration and benefits was “… not laudable but artificial and unsustainable”. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 5:01 am by SHG
 That happened in North Carolina, where the state’s cyberbullying law was considered in State v. [read post]
  In these joined cases, the Court took the opportunity to re-write the penalties doctrine, which had not been considered by the House of Lords or Supreme Court since the 1914 case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd [1914] UKHL 1. [read post]
The Supreme Court Justices made the most of this opportunity by restating the law on penalties and thereby creating a new leading authority for this doctrine, to replace the early 20th Century authority of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company v New Garage and Motor Company [1915] AC 79. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
He continued to claim that he was arguing with his girlfriend before he saw the officers, and stated that she was also the person he had called from the booking area. [read post]