Search for: "U. S. v. Barrett*#"
Results 21 - 40
of 253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
" City of Boerne, 521 U. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
(BARRETT, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:51 am
" U. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 8:46 am
Barrett and Sandlin v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 7:40 am
Flores, 521 U. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
”] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Case Background The Supreme Court is poised to resolve this circuit split in Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 7:26 pm
Presently on the emergency docket, Department of Homeland Security et al. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Ct. 2355, 2376–84 (2023) (Barrett, J., concurring). [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:07 pm
Here's how Justice Barrett described the case at the outset of her opinion. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
Justice Barrett used a similar locution in Doe v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:11 am
S. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Louis U. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
After all, even Justice Scalia (Justice Barrett's mentor) used to emphasize that textualists attend to context. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
” Justice Barrett, remember, clerked for Justice Scalia, author of the watershed confrontation clause case, Crawford v. [read post]