Search for: "U. S. v. Harris"
Results 21 - 40
of 348
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
” 42 U. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:50 am
In Harris v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:50 am
Harris (No. 10-520), the Court granted the petitions, vacated the decisions below, and remanded for further consideration in light of last week’s decision in Kurns v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:57 am
" Towers v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
Harris County, 529 U. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
Harris County, 529 U. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 4:05 pm
Harris as decided by the U. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 5:40 pm
Dale Oesterle comments:The Supreme Court has agreed to take a case on executive pay, Jones v Harris Associates. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
In reply, Harris stated that it was ARG’ s decision as to whether he would pay for anotherappraisal to support a discount. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 2:30 pm
(pro bono counsel in Hamdan v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
” That case decision, Pamela Harris v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 7:25 am
The case is Hetronic International, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Portash and Harris v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
The U-T San Diego and Marcia Coyle of the Blog of Legal Times cover last week’s cert. grants in Riley v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:42 am
Judge Harry Leinenweber of the U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 1:01 am
Supreme Court handed down its decision on the case McCleskey v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:42 am
In Harris v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:00 am
Harris today holding that a police officer ramming a fleeing suspect's car that left the suspect paralyzed was reasonable under Tennessee v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:46 pm
The revolution seemed over two years later, when the Court decided in Harris v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 2:18 pm
In fact, during a bench conference on an unrelated motion in limine, defense counsel told the court that, as part of her trial strategy, she intended to elicit testimony about he Facebook page to discredit Harris's identification of the owner of that page as one of the robbers.State v. [read post]
