Search for: "U. S. v. Hunter"
Results 21 - 40
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2021, 4:40 am
The dismissal of plaintiff’s 2017 action was on the merits, and not, as plaintiff argues, based on pleading defects (Pritsker v Zamansky LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op 33980[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2018]; see Feigen v Advance Capital Mgt. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:49 pm
There is only one Barack Hussein Obama according to the U. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:35 am
September 14, 2010) Here’s the latest example of the confusion caused by the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Cappuccitti v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am
Supreme Court decisions that form the basis of the “political structure doctrine”: Hunter v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Hunter’s Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304, 348 (1816). . . . [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:10 am
The plaintiff appealed the judgment of the Nassau County District Court to the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, which affirmed the judgment (see Weisman Law Group, P.C. v Kleinman, 60 Misc 3d 133[A], 2018 NY Slip Op 51042[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2018]). [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:12 am
The doctrine of res judicata applies to preclude plaintiff’s claims asserted in the third action, as those claims arise out of the same transaction or series of transactions that were brought to a final conclusion in the first action by plaintiff against, among others, defendant Allan Houston (Rondeau v Houston, 2013 NY Slip Op 33363[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2013], affd 118 AD3d 638 [1st Dept 2014], lv dismissed 24 NY3d 999 [2015]; see In re… [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:25 am
However, the court discussed that “[U]nder New York’s transactional analysis approach to res judicata, ‘once a claim is brought to a final conclusion, all other claims arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions are barred, even if based upon different theories or if seeking a different remedy’ (Matter of Hunter, 4 NY3d 260, 269, quoting O’Brien v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am
The Appellant was not given a proper opportunity to contest the ICT’s ruling and therefore could not amount to Hunter abuse. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:51 am
S. 731, 749 (1982))); 520 U. [read post]
21 May 2016, 1:01 am
Nevertheless, such a philosophy did not always coincide with conservative interests, as when Burger led the court in the unanimous decision United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm
Beyer was recently mentioned in Hunter, Jr. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
This blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 12:40 pm
Missouri v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:04 am
S. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:04 am
S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 7:29 pm
” 28 U. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:29 pm
Well, in Bowlby v. [read post]
