Search for: "U. S. v. Lightly"
Results 21 - 40
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2021, 7:11 am
See Everson v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 7:06 pm
Each was written as events unfolded (each essay is dated to the time of its initial writing) and lightly edited for the book. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Blogs are hosted on some company's computer systems. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
We do not so lightly treat our determinations as dicta and our decisions as overruling others sub silentio. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
Both of these adjustments are based on increases in the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers (CPI-U) published by the United States Department of Labor. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:17 pm
Knick v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 9:09 am
Cooper v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:46 am
Robinson v Day 2019 NY Slip Op 30153(U) January 16, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 600907/2010 Judge: O. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 5:53 am
Matthias Zigann of the Munich I Regional Court ("Landgericht München I") just announced his panel's decisions on, technically, ten Qualcomm v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 10:50 am
So, this is certainly not something to treat lightly when representing a client facing such a charge. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:48 pm
This Court "does not overturn its precedents lightly. [read post]
8 May 2018, 4:15 am
Kessler, 2008 WL 2563483 (Sup Ct, NY County 2008); S. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:49 am
The family-owned business at the center of Vaccari v Vaccari, 2018 NY Slip Op 30546(U) [Sup Ct NY County Mar. 28, 2018], decided last month by veteran Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Eileen Bransten, is a classic example of fraying family bonds in the successive ownership generations caused by divergent career interests and sibling sense of injustice over disparate treatment by their parents. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
Marquez v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court’s May, 2015 decision in Tibble v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
….[22] Although the Consortium argued that this finding was based on the weight given to the evidence by the Board, a matter with which this Court should not lightly intervene, it is difficult to conclude anything other than that the Board, through oversight, overlooked the expert evidence and submissions it accepted as exhibits AC-114 and AC-114A on December 5, 2014. [23] The Board’s clear wording that Access provided no evidence rebuts the presumption that a… [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
….[22] Although the Consortium argued that this finding was based on the weight given to the evidence by the Board, a matter with which this Court should not lightly intervene, it is difficult to conclude anything other than that the Board, through oversight, overlooked the expert evidence and submissions it accepted as exhibits AC-114 and AC-114A on December 5, 2014. [23] The Board’s clear wording that Access provided no evidence rebuts the presumption that a… [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:33 am
A. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
….[22] Although the Consortium argued that this finding was based on the weight given to the evidence by the Board, a matter with which this Court should not lightly intervene, it is difficult to conclude anything other than that the Board, through oversight, overlooked the expert evidence and submissions it accepted as exhibits AC-114 and AC-114A on December 5, 2014. [23] The Board’s clear wording that Access provided no evidence rebuts the presumption that a… [read post]
