Search for: "U. S. v. Mays" Results 21 - 40 of 7,431
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Spirt v Spirt 2024 NY Slip Op 31873(U) May 22, 2024 Supreme Court, New York CountyDocket Number: Index No. 160271/2023 Judge: Gerald Lebovits is not a legal malpractice case. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
On Friday 31 May 2024, Belfast’s High Court found that sections 12 – 16 of the Justice (Sexual Offences and Trafficking Victims) Act (Northern Ireland) 2022 were incompatible with press freedom and Article 10 ECHR rights. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Rule then goes on to say: “[U]nless the juror is aged 70 years or older, the juror may be required to furnish [documentation/verification to prove the impairment.] [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:31 am by Edelboim Lieberman PLLC
The business’s creditors will be focused on protecting their right to payment to the fullest extent possible, and they may assert various types of claims and defenses in order to do so. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:07 am by Yosi Yahoudai
You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site. 🚨TRAFFIC ADVISORY: 16th Street from V St – U St is closed while officers investigate a traffic collision. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 23 May 2024 there was a pre-trial review in Bates v Rubython and Another KB-2023-002975. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm by Christine Kexel Chabot
  On May 16, 2024, the Court issued its first in a series of blockbuster administrative law decisions: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
The panel said that, “[u]sing the tools of history and tradition to which the Supreme Court directed us in [District of Columbia v.] [read post]