Search for: "U. S. v. Sauer"
Results 21 - 29
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2017, 3:53 am
Just as the roof proved inadequate to the task, so the proofs on plaintiff’s case were inadequate to the claim in Petre v Alouidor & Assoc. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 3:13 am
Battaglia v Grillo 2012 NY Slip Op 31588(U) June 6, 2012 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 014807-10 Judge: Vito M. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 3:10 am
Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438 442 (2007); Cummings v Donovan, 36 AD3d 648 (2 Dept 2007). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:40 am
Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]; Bilin v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:12 am
Moreover, given the Plaintiff's arbitration award, the Plaintiff has suffered no damages proximately caused by the Defendant's purported malpractice (Rudolf v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:48 am
Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442, 835 N.Y.S.2d 534 [2007]). [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:52 am
However, Justice Schaffer gives a much better response in Landau, P.C. v LaRossa, Mitchell & Ross ; 2010 NY Slip Op 50620(U) Decided on April 7, 2010 ; Supreme Court, New York County ; Schlesinger, J. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 3:22 am
Mizuno v Fischoff & Assoc. ;2010 NY Slip Op 50064(U) Decided on January 14, 2010 Supreme Court, Suffolk County ;Whelan, J. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 4:39 am
To establish the element of causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages but for the attorney's negligence (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; Wray v Mallilo & Grossman, 54 AD3d 328, 329 [2008]; Carrasco v Pena & Kahn, 48 AD3d at 396). [read post]
