Search for: "U. S. v. Smart" Results 21 - 40 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2007, 12:36 pm
" What I mean is that while it's good you're smart enough to know you're protected by privilege, and you're smart enough to recognize when that right might have been violated, you also need to be smart enough to think through the next step, and ask yourself if it was really a bad thing or whether your lawyer was really doing something to help you. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP v e-Smart Tech., Inc. ;2011 NY Slip Op 30651(U); Sup Ct, New York County; Docket Number: 113108/09; Judge: Judith J. [read post]
  The European Union’s Stance on the Right to be Forgotten In the European Union, the idea of the “Right to be Forgotten” became popular after the prominent, Google Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 12:57 pm by Jeffrey Neuburger
Ct., Cook Cty filed Sept. 20, 2018), the plaintiff brought suit against U-Tec Group Inc., a company that manufactures biometric-enabled “keyless” door locks, alleging that U-Tec’s technology required users to upload, store and transmit their fingerprints to open the smart door locks without U-Tec first obtaining the proper notice and consent and without informing users of U-Tec’s data retention policy. [read post]