Search for: "U.S. v. Atkinson*" Results 21 - 40 of 100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
A Probe into GDPR Adequacy Based on EU Fundamental Rights, Jusletter IT, 21 February 2019, Laura Drechsler, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), LSTS, Interdisciplinary Research Group on Law Science Technology & Society; Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO) The Research Exemption Carve Out: Understanding Research Participants Rights Under GDPR and U.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am by Margaret Taylor
It is not entirely clear from the face of the statute that this provision is applicable: the provision applies when the inspector general does not find a complaint or information to be credible, but in this case Atkinson did. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  DRE  The HistPhil forum on the Dartmouth College v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm by Eliot Kim
On Feb. 27, the Supreme Court issued a 7-1 opinion in Jam v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
At the original trial the jury awarded $520,000 compensation for the appropriated land, as well as $300,000 for damages to the residue after the appropriation. 1 125 U.S. 2655 (2005). 2 2005 Ohio 6469; 2005 Ohio App. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
Currently pursuing a U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]