Search for: "U.S. v. Baker Hughes, Inc."
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2014, 7:45 pm
Fegert, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Supreme Court, and agreed that the FTC had made out a prima facie case under the burden-shifting framework commonly attributed to Baker Hughes. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Anthem, Inc.[25] But the evidence is plenty. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
City of Boise, 15-493 (whether the Idaho Supreme Court correctly concluded that the U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm
The McNulty Memorandum, released in 2006, stated that prosecutors could only request privilege waivers if there was a “legitimate need” for the privileged information, and that if a legitimate need existed after going through a multi-factor analysis, prosecutors should seek the least intrusive waiver necessary to complete a thorough investigation.[4] The Filip Memorandum, not a memorandum per se, made revisions in 2008 to the U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 am
Among the companies that have successfully used the (i)(9) argument recently to exclude special meeting proposals are: CVS Caremark, Medco, Honeywell, NiSource, Baker Hughes, Becton Dickinson & Co., Eastman Chemical, and Safeway. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 3:42 pm
District Court for the Middle District of Florida had issued a preliminary injunction in the case of Properties of the Villages Inc. v. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
U.S. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
The memo was prepared for U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 9:49 am
That’s straight from Brooke Group v. [read post]
