Search for: "U.S. v. Balu*"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2017, 8:30 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:53 am
David Houck summarized the Nov. 17 military commission hearings in U.S. v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
First, as it relates to voluntariness: Ruiz marshals United States v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm
” In the end, and by distinguishing from US v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:51 am
Vo and Brady v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm
Prosecutor Army Colonel Robert Swann jumps to it, continuing his direct examination of an anonymous U.S. army captain from yesterday. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am
Prosecution team member Robert Swann calls an unnamed U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
See ECF No. 251; see also Al-Nashiri v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am
Murphy v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:54 pm
Under Crawford v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:20 pm
The government responds that the video recording is not discoverable, since bin Attash recorded it by his own volition and not at the direction of the U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 6:55 am
For the United States, Clay Trivett, Robert Swann, Edward Ryan and Major Christopher of the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
General Martins begins by calling Judge Pohl’s attention to the ‘ten-category framework’ from his 2014 discovery order in United States v. al Nashiri. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am
For that point, the brief sites Seymour v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:28 am
Similarly, Assistant U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:48 am
Al Baluchi’s waiver was involuntary. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
This week’s Foreign Policy Essay considered the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:57 am
Earlier this week, Military Judge James Pohl, the presiding judge at the military commission case United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 2:31 pm
The defense relied on the 2008 case of Boumediene v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm
James Cannell argued that under the test established in Boumediene v. [read post]
