Search for: "U.S. v. Chandler*"
Results 21 - 40
of 193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2021, 8:16 pm
Neifert-White Co., 390 U.S. 228, 232 (1968). [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:15 am
On June 10, the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:15 am
On June 10, the U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 7:38 am
Chandler v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 10:44 pm
And Roberts included the same citation in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 6:21 am
The shareholder primacy approach of Delaware law is well summarized by then Chancellor William Chandler in the case of eBay Domestic Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 1:16 pm
Supreme Court held in Cyan v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm
Movement was a little slower in the state Supreme Court and U.S. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 4:13 pm
Epstein, 516 U.S. 367, 377, 382 (1996). [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:01 am
Emmerich, and Sabastian V. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 1:25 pm
O'Brien, 391 U.S. 367, 376-77 (1968)). [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:11 pm
Dunkin’ Donuts IHOP Bridgestone DuPont IKEA Buffalo Wild Wings Duracell ln-N-Out Burger Campbell’s Soup Eddie V’s International Paper Carl’s Jr. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:12 am
Toolson v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
Instagram has announced it will remove the number of “likes” visible from posts in the U.S. in an attempt to decrease competitive pressure between people, and promote safety and mental health. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 10:15 am
” You can access today’s order of the U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:19 pm
We also need to look at the frankly horrible treatment that some in tech have wrought: from young girls to aspiring women scientists and technologists to contract and gig workers to people of color both in the U.S. and around the world. [read post]
