Search for: "U.S. v. Chin*" Results 21 - 40 of 4,228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The DOJ’s initially identified countries are China (including Hong Kong and Macau), Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and Venezuela, and the restrictions would also apply to any entity owned by, controlled by, or subject to the jurisdiction or direction of a country of concern as well as any person “knowingly causing or directing, directly or indirectly, a violation” of the regulations. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 2:07 pm by Larry
Such is the case in Ninestar Corporation et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
  I was delighted to have been invited to participate in the Asser Institute: Center for International and European Law & University of Amsterdam Law School-[Spring Academy] Technologies of sustainability due diligence: Digital tools and global value chain regulations which takes place in The Hague,  Netherlands from 8-12 April 2024. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:05 am by George Croner
” While the Second Circuit noted in its decision in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Whether you’re here in person or participating virtually from around the country, or even overseas, I thank you for joining us. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am by Gwendolyn Whidden
ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR — INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Thursday issued additional provisional measures in South Africa v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am by Beatrice Yahia
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Simon Lester
Third, Congress explicitly recognized that, by definition, support for the construction of foreign vessels used in international trade burdens or restricts U.S. commerce and thus is a proper target for action under Section 301. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Simon Lester
Third, Congress explicitly recognized that, by definition, support for the construction of foreign vessels used in international trade burdens or restricts U.S. commerce and thus is a proper target for action under Section 301. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 7:12 pm by David Greene
  If ByteDance sells TikTok to domestic owners so that TikTok can stay in business in the U.S., and if the same propaganda appears on the site, is the U.S. now powerless to do anything about it? [read post]