Search for: "U.S. v. Holt"
Results 21 - 40
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2024, 4:59 pm
On December 3, 2024, the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 4:15 am
A cert. petition (full text) was filed last September in another unrelated case also raising the constitutionality of prison grooming policies-- Holt v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Holt v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 4:07 pm
(U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:39 pm
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 584 U.S. __ (2018)- (dissenting opinion).Holt v. [read post]
4 May 2014, 12:21 pm
Holt, 2014 U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 11:40 am
Supreme Court today heard oral arguments in Holt v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:10 am
Holt, 2014 U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm
Supreme Court's recent decisions in Hobby Lobby and Holt v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
” [Disclosures: John Elwood, a frequent contributor to this blog, is among the counsel to the petitioner in Holt v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:45 pm
” Rearden and Holt leave no doubt that this material qualifies as sadistic or masochistic content. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:30 am
Holt, 2017 U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
Jason Colantuoni and Brian Holt, 1:11-cv-11446 (D.Mass. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:42 am
Harris, 133 S.Ct. 1050 (2013) Google Scholar) Holt v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:42 pm
Tumey v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
LEXIS 3083 (ED MI, Jan. 10, 2017), a Michigan federal district court held that the Supreme Court's 2015 decision in Holt v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Quay, (2d Cir., Nov. 13, 2017), the 2nd Circuit concluded that a district court should not have dismissed as conclusively non-religious an inmate's claim that stuffed animals are necessary for his religious practice.In Holt v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:05 pm
Yesterday the U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
However it remanded plaintiff's RLUIPA claim in light of the Supreme Court's intervening decision in Holt v. [read post]
