Search for: "U.S. v. James"
Results 21 - 40
of 5,494
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
”[4] The regulatory record created an uphill battle for plaintiffs.[5] Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”), the U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
As with James, Bragg saw it in Trump. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:55 pm
The U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:18 pm
On Feb. 6, 2024, the U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm
Similarly, in Allison v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Freed, — U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
In 1962, in Robinson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:12 am
Donnelley, Corp., 368 F.3d 123 (2d Cir. 2004) (“materially significant disadvantage”); James v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:52 am
U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Rev. 965 (2017); Atherton v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:11 am
Robinson v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:06 am
In Lindke v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 1:25 pm
The lawsuit (State of Texas v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:25 am
” Attorney James G. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Whether you’re here in person or participating virtually from around the country, or even overseas, I thank you for joining us. [read post]
