Search for: "U.S. v. Kelly" Results 21 - 40 of 1,027
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Agathe Demarais, Backfire:  How Sanctions Reshape the World Against U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan, and Karla Ortiz challenge the defendants’ use of images of their artwork, registered with the U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  (Infodocket) ICYMI, Trump v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Eggshell white, Halloween orange, robin’s egg blue, ruby red, adhesive bandage tan, celadon green or Kelly green, and daffodil yellow. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:42 am by centerforartlaw
Another significant legal battle involving murals and VARA unfolded in the case of Kerson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am by Sherica Celine
Contractually obligates any recipients of the information to comply with all provisions of this subdivision. 21 Well-known work by the National Institute of Standards and Technology 22 and the U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:15 am
  That case, however, involved an Illinois corporation that quoted a Delaware Court of Chancery decision, Kelly v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 1:21 pm by Asbestos Legal Center
Insulation supplier and contractor 51.8% Estimate over 400 million – JM Insulation – Southern California U.S. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 12:15 pm by Kelly Lavelle
TAR has been accepted by the U.S. courts since the seminal 2012 decision in Da Silva Moore v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“A determination whether to grant such leave is within the Supreme Court’s broad discretion, and the exercise of that discretion will not be lightly disturbed” (Gitlin v Chirinkin, 60 AD3d 901, 902; see U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]