Search for: "U.S. v. Sealed Case" Results 21 - 40 of 1,610
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am by Eugene Volokh
FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1178 (6th Cir.1983) (so stating in opposition to sealing generally). [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am by Adam Ziegler
So we used a vacuum-sealing machine designed for meat-packing to individually seal every book into a moisture-resistant bag before shipping them all to an underground limestone mine in Kentucky. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
   The Lee case resurfaced yesterday in an opinion issued by the First District Court of Appeal in Wood v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:55 am by Trane Robinson
Seale, 558 U.S. 985, 985 (2009) (Stevens, J., respecting the dismissal of the certified question, joined by Scalia, J.). [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
He could not do what other Chief Justices had done in cases like Brown v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” This is precisely what the Supreme Court called for in TSC Industries v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
<by the constitution>”); the Wilson/Rutledge draft for the Committee of Detail (“and appoint (Officers in all Cases) . . . not otherwise provided for by this Constitution”); the draft constitution finally approved by the Committee of Detail and circulated to the delegates on August 6 (“and shall appoint officers in all cases not otherwise provided for by this Constitution”); and, perhaps most significantly, the September 4 report of the Committee… [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
Our animation - which has been viewed more than a MILLION times on TikTok in the last 24 hours - exposes the brutality inherent in hare coursing, as we put forward our case for the Hunting of Mammals Bill, a piece of legislation which we believe would finally see an end to all hunting with dogs. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:38 am by Beatrice Yahia
“The Iranian-backed Houthi terrorists’ report of an alleged successful attack on M/V Ocean Jazz is patently false,” the U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. [read post]