Search for: "U.S. v. Strickland"
Results 21 - 40
of 561
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2023, 8:51 pm
Illinois, 440 U.S. 367 (1979)); requiring that counsel be effective (Strickland v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:04 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 3:53 pm
Stokes 22-1234Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 5:43 pm
In its analysis of the deficiency prong of the test in Strickland v. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:59 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
The U.S. [read post]
Can fishermen be required to pay for federal monitors? And by the way – should Chevron be overruled?
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am
A divided panel of the U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
The U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 9:56 am
The standard for evaluating claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in a court-martial is the two-part test established in Strickland v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 3:25 am
Whether you’re good with lack of preservation arguments, or the exceptionally low bar of Strickland v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Wiggins: Standby counsel appointed by Court does not violate self-representation right. 1984 Strickland v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 3:00 pm
Supreme Court precedent in Strickland v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:04 am
United States, 561 U.S. 358, 405-11 (2010); McCulloch v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:48 am
The U.S. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:45 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:39 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 12:09 pm
Stop was not unreasonably extended, and the trial court did not err in crediting officer’s testimony U.S. v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 7:19 am
A divided panel of the U.S. [read post]
