Search for: "U.S. v. Sullivan (frank)"
Results 21 - 40
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
Click here to read the remainder of the Sullivan & Cromwell publication - Designation of Systemically Important Financial Institutions Nonbank Financial Companies Under Dodd-Frank. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
The Salman ruling was subsequently reinforced in the U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:18 am
The court did find "cause for concern" in the fact that Coscia’s counsel represented one of the government’s witnesses, but concluded that this conflict did not prejudice Coscia or affect his attorney’s performance at trial (U.S. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
” Frank v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:13 pm
Sullivan, “Shareholder Bylaw Proposals, Delaware Certification, and the SEC After CA, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
The commodities fraud and manipulation landscape has evolved since enactment of the anti-spoofing statute as part of the Dodd-Frank Act, as cases have worked their way through the system, including the upholding of the U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 8:04 am
Attorneys for Timberlake and the Indiana attorney general are in U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:25 am
Sullivan, Ms. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
In the other case, I happily defended a member of Lyndon LaRouche’s U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Schwartz, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Wednesday, April 24, 2024 Tags: Disclosure, Macquarie v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Schwartz, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Wednesday, April 24, 2024 Tags: Disclosure, Macquarie v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
The author urges that the other circuits follow the Second Circuit in Madden v Midland because the Dodd-Frank was not made retroactive and therefore provides no relief against predatory lending abuses that occurred prior to the law's effectiveness date.Madden v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Sullivan, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Sunday, January 17, 2016 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Derivatives, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Leverage,Mutual funds, No-action letters, Private funds, Risk, Risk management, Rule 18f-4, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities Regulation, Swaps PECO v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
” 5) The Race to the Bottom: SEC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
The author urges that the other circuits follow the Second Circuit in Madden v Midland because the Dodd-Frank was not made retroactive and therefore provides no relief against predatory lending abuses that occurred prior to the law's effectiveness date. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:31 am
Sullivan. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:45 am
In Middleton v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
Having received initial comment letters from the U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Because Cantero’s mortgage pre-dated Dodd-Frank, the U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 11:31 pm
See, e.g., United States v. $186,416.00 in U.S. [read post]
