Search for: "UBER, INC"
Results 21 - 40
of 790
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
California’s High Court Authorizes Stay Of Non-Individual PAGA Claims During Pendency Of Arbitration
7 Aug 2023, 10:20 am
Since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:59 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 1023 EDA 2021 (Pa. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:09 am
Uber Technologies, Inc. ostensibly deals a significant blow to employers by holding that an employee compelled to arbitrate claims under the Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) maintains standing to bring PAGA action on behalf of aggrieved employees in court. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:21 am
Uber Technologies, Inc. marks a major shift back in favor of workers. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Techs., Inc., No. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Techs., Inc., No. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:49 pm
Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm
Uber Techs., Inc., No. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 5:39 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:45 am
If you have been injured or if you have lost a loved one in a crash involving an Uber driver or other rideshare driver in San Diego or anywhere in Southern California, contact the skilled and proven team at Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc. at 1.800.GO.HARRIS for a free case consultation today. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:14 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., No. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:14 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., No. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 8:39 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., No. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 4:30 pm
Uber Technologies, Inc., meaning that their claims may live on way past the first volley. [read post]
