Search for: "UNITED GALAXY, INC."
Results 21 - 40
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2013, 4:30 am
United Galaxy Inc., d/b/a Tri-County Lexus, (D NJ), orders the dealership to pay $50,000 in damages for failing to reasonably accommodate Gurpreet Kherha's religious exercise. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
Unilever US, Inc., decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on July 9. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:07 am
Apple, Inc., where the U.S. [read post]
26 May 2013, 5:30 am
Acanac Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:30 am
Acanac Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 9:33 pm
See In re Baxter Int'l, Inc., 698 F.3d 1349, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:10 am
Widely unnoticed by the public, a fight between Apple and Samsung in two venues -- the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States District Court for the Northern District of California -- over the proper way forward for their first U.S. federal litigation is ecalating. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 10:14 pm
Apple's petition mentions that two months after the Galaxy Nexus decision, another Federal Circuit panel issued a more injunction-friendly ruling in a different IT patent case (Presidio Components, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 11:41 pm
’s Zoll unit has filed a suit against Royal Philips Electronics’ Respironics Inc. before the US District Court of Delaware, alleging infringement of a U.S. patent with equipment used to monitor patients being treated for sleep-disordered breathing. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 8:11 am
On March 17, 2004, Apple Computer, Inc. filed patent D504,889. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 1:17 am
Although Apple secured an injunction to prevent Samsung's Galaxy Nexus from entering the American market, the smartphone has remained on the market while Samsung appeals the decision to the United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:58 pm
With the exception of certain kinds of standard-essential patents (for example, cellular standards patents), it's clear that the product will still be sold after being modified to work around the enforced patents, maybe after a minor disruption caused by the need to make those modifications.If products are named in an injunction order, they are only examples of infringement and do not limit the scope of an injunction that is worded like Judge Koh's two recent injunctions against… [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
First, to everyone’s surprise, although back in June Judge Koh granted a preliminary injunction against Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 10.1, that was one of the very few products that escaped an actual infringement finding from the jury, and so Samsung has (rightly) asked that the injunction be dissolved. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:10 am
Qualcomm Inc., 501 F.3d 297, 313–14 (3d Cir. 2007); Daniel G. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:10 am
Qualcomm Inc., 501 F.3d 297, 313–14 (3d Cir. 2007); Daniel G. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
The United States District Court in the Northern District of California has issued a preliminary injunction in favor of Apple, Inc. that prevents Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. from manufacturing or distributing its Galaxy Nexus smartphone in the United States. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:36 pm
Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:46 am
Galaxie filed a third-party claim against the Plaintiff’s employer, Nanotec Metals, Inc. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 11:12 am
Samsung Electronics lost a bid to overturn a ruling barring its local unit from selling its Galaxy 10.1 tablets in Germany, handing a symbolic legal victory to Apple Inc. in efforts to keep its lead spot in the tablet computer market. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:53 am
Apple was not successful in obtaining an injunction against distribution of Samsung’s Galaxy Tab in the United States, although the judge stated that Apple’s design patents might be infringed. [read post]
